Introduction

Joule was a pioneer in trying to establish the numerical value for the mechanical equivalent of heat in the early 1800s. Closer to the end of the century, Professor Osborne Reynolds attempted to obtain a more accurate value for this equivalent. He studied the experiments that Joule performed, and attempted to improve upon the accuracy of these experiments. A brief synopsis of problems incurred by Joule's experiments, as well as some of the major improvements made can be found below. Please note while reading the passage the care with which experiments were performed back in the 1800s.

Theory

Below is an excerpt from Professor Osborne Reynolds, On the Mechanical Equivalent of Heat, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 66:601-733 (1897).

The determination by Joule, in 1849, of the expenditure of mechanical effect (772.69 lbs. falling 1 foot) necessary to raise the temperature of 1 lb. of water, weighed in vacuo, 1° Fahr. Between the temperatures of 50° and 60° Fahr. (at Manchester), together with the second, in 1878, 772.55 ft.-lbs., at the latitude of Greenwich, established once for all the existence of a physically constant ratio between the work expended in producing heat and the heat produced; while the extreme simplicity of his methods, his marvelous skill as an experimenter, and the complete system of checks he adopted, have led to the universal acceptance of the numbers he obtained as being within the limits he himself assigned (1 foot), of the true ratio of work expended in his experiments in producing heat and the heat produced as measured on the scale of the thermometer on which he spent so much time and care.
The acceptance of J = 772, as the mechanical equivalent of heat, amounts to the acceptance of the scale between 50 and 60 on Joule's thermometer b as the standard of temperature over this range.
Joule's thermometers are now in the custody of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society (having been confided to its care by Mr A. Joule); so that this material standard is available. But the standard of temperature actually established by Joule is universally available wherever the British standard of length is available, together with pure water and the necessary means and skill of expending a definite quantity of work in raising the temperature of water between 50° and 60° Fahr., since in this way the scale on any thermometer may be compared with that on Joule's.
The difficulty of access to Joule's thermometer, and the inherent difficulty of making an accurate determination of the equivalent, have limited the number of such comparisons.
The most serious attempts have been made with the very desirable object of determining the mechanical equivalent of a thermal unit, measured on the scale of pressures of gas at constant volumes, first recognised by Joule as the nearest approximation to absolute temperature.
The results of these comparisons have been various, all having apparently shown that Joule's standard degree of temperature is less than the one-hundred-and-eightieth part between freezing and boiling points on the scale of pressure of gas at constant volume, the differences being from 0.1 to 1.0 percent. Joule himself contemplated comparing his thermometer with the scale of air pressures, but did not do so. So that only indirect comparisons have been possible.
Hirn, who was the first to follow Joule, in one of his researches introduced a method of measuring the work done which afforded much greater facility for applying the work done to the water than the falling weights used by Joule in his first determination, and this was adopted by Joule in his second determination. But notwithstanding the greater facilities enjoyed by subsequent observers, owing to the progress of physical appliances, the inherent difficulties remained. The losses from radiation and conduction could only be minimised by restricting the range of temperature, and this insured thermometric difficulties, particularly with the air thermometer, which, it seems, does not admit of very close reading. This, together with certain criticisms, of which some of the methods employed admit, appear to have left it still an open question what exact rise in the temperature in the scale of air pressures corresponds to the 772 ft.-lbs.
...The institution of an air thermometer was carefully considered and rejected. But it occurred to me that it might be possible to avoid the introduction of scales of the thermometers, just as before, and yet obtain the result. If it could be so arranged that the water should enter the brake at the temperature of melting ice and leave it at the temperature of water boiling under the standard pressure, all that would be required of the thermometers would be the identification of these temperatures. At first the difficulties appeared to be very formidable. But on trying, by gradually restricting the supply of water to the brake when it was absorbing some 60 H.-P., and finding that it ran quite steadily with its automatic adjustment till the temperature of the effluent water was within 3° or 4° of 212° Fahr., I further considered the matter and formed preliminary designs for what seemed the most essential appliances to meet the altered circumstances.
...The entire system of working was designed to secure the most perfect elimination of radiation possible. Thus, it was arranged in the first place that the trials be made in pairs, one heavy trial and one light trial, made under circumstances as nearly similar as possible, except in respect of load and water. The loads in the first instance being 1200 and 600 foot-pounds, and the quantities of water such that the final temperature should be as nearly as possible 212° Fahr., and, after the preliminary trials, 300 revolutions per minutes was adopted as the speed for all the trials, 60 minutes as the time of running. The inlet and outlet thermometers to be read after the first minute, and every two minutes; also the temperature of the laboratory as shown by a thermometer in a carefully-chosen place. This temperature to be maintained as nearly constant as possible. The setting of the regulators during each trial to be recorded; also the pressure of the artificial atmosphere, and that in the supply pipe after passing the coil; and, subsequently, the reading of the thermometers in the stuffing-box and bearings taken every five minutes, and the speed gauge every two minutes. The observations and incidents being recorded by the rules in surveying, in ink, in a book, and distinct from any reductions. The initial and final reading on the scales and counter being included, as were also the initial and final readings of the inlet and outlet thermometers and speed gauge for the purpose of determining the terminal differences of the heat in the brakes.
As it was impossible to make trials simultaneously, and so secure similar conditions in the laboratory, it was at first arranged that the trials should be made in groups, including four pairs of trials.
Experimental Data

Download this EXCEL file for data analysis. You will also need to load the macros for the EXCEL spreadsheet. Answer yes for loading the macros.

Download Files
FileTitleTypeSize
Reynolds.xlsReynolds' Data Microsoft Excel 70K
Analysis
  1. Calculate the mean value for diverse values of J from Table 1, but exclude Joule's careful measurements (7-11) and the accepted value (12).
  2. For the mean calculated in part A, determine the 95% confidence interval using small sample (student-t) statistics.
  3. Redo parts A and B above, but first apply a test for outliers.
  4. Calculate the mean and 95% confidence interval for data sets 2-11.
  5. Calculate the mean and 95% confidence interval for J using only Joule's careful measurements (data sets 7-11).
  6. Write a careful discussion of your findings from parts A-E.